Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -BeyondWealth Network
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-19 18:00:38
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- See Ariana Madix SURve Up Justice in First Look at Buying Back My Daughter Movie
- Vanderpump Rules' Lala Kent’s Affordable Amazon Haul is So Chic You’d Never “Send it to Darrell
- New York Assembly Approves Climate Bill That Would Cut Emissions to Zero
- Trump's 'stop
- Anxiety Mounts Abroad About Climate Leadership and the Volatile U.S. Election
- No major flight disruptions from new 5G wireless signals around airports
- Vanderpump Rules Reunion: Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss' Affair Comes to a Shocking Conclusion
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- New Details About Kim Cattrall’s And Just Like That Scene Revealed
Ranking
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- With an All-Hands-on-Deck International Summit, Biden Signals the US is Ready to Lead the World on Climate
- Big Meat and Dairy Companies Have Spent Millions Lobbying Against Climate Action, a New Study Finds
- See Ariana Madix SURve Up Justice in First Look at Buying Back My Daughter Movie
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Vanessa and Nick Lachey Taking Much Needed Family Time With Their 3 Kids
- They're gnot gnats! Swarms of aphids in NYC bugging New Yorkers
- Fox News agrees to pay $12 million to settle lawsuits from former producer Abby Grossberg
Recommendation
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
The Warming Climates of the Arctic and the Tropics Squeeze the Mid-latitudes, Where Most People Live
The Ultimatum’s Xander Shares What’s Hard to Watch Back in Vanessa Relationship
Matty Healy Sends Message to Supporters After Taylor Swift Breakup
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Lala Kent Addresses Vanderpump Rules Reunion Theories—Including Raquel Leviss Pregnancy Rumors
5 Ways Trump’s Clean Power Rollback Strips Away Health, Climate Protections
Why Tom Holland Is Taking a Year-Long Break From Acting